Striking the Balance between Human Rights Online and State Security Concerns: The Russian Way in a Comparative Context

Author:

Pollicino Oreste,Soldatov Oleg

Abstract

In pursuit of solutions to curb cybercrime, legislators engage in an analysis proportionally weighing freedom of expression and other societal interests. The balance between the two concepts differs dramatically across different jurisdictions. This Article looks into a widely discussed legislative package regulating the online domain, enacted by the Sixth Convocation of the Russian Parliament (2011–2016)—the State Duma. The authors operate under the assumption that the Russian approach might have a broad spillover effect. With this in mind, the authors outline the current status quo regarding Internet regulations in the EU, disentangle and contextualize the legislation under scrutiny, emphasize Russian influence over Eastern European countries, and describe the tumultuous relationship between the Russian Federation and the European Court of Human Rights.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Law

Reference154 articles.

1. Putin: vyhod Rossii iz-pod jurisdikcii ESPCh vozmozhen, no vopros na povestke ne stoit [Putin: Russia Can Leave the Jurisdiction of the European Court of Human Rights, but the Question is not on the Agenda], TASS (Aug. 14, 2015), www.tass.ru/politika/1380242.

2. Filatenko v. Russia, App. No. 73219/01 (June 3, 2004), http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/. In this case, the Court reached the conclusion that opinions and information aired during an electoral campaign should be considered as part of a debate on issues of public interest and that there is little scope under Article 10 for restrictions on such a debate.

3. Shabanov & Tren v. Russia, App. No. 5433/02 (Dec. 2006), http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/. In this case, the Court explored, inter alia, the journalistic duties to cover stories of general interest and to avoid gratuitous attacks on public personalities' reputations.

4. Oleg Soldatov, Data Retention Under the 2016 Yarovaya Law in Russia, Medialaws (March 2, 2017), www.medialaws.eu/data-retention-under-the-2016-yarovaya-law-in-russia-disrupting-the-european-status-quo/.

5. European Court of Human Rights HUDOC Database Search, hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22fulltext%22:[%22internet%22],%22respondent%22:[%22RUS%22],%22article%22:[%228%22,%228-1%22,%228-2%22,%2210%22,%2210-1%22,%2210-2%22],%22documentcollectionid2%22:[%22COMMUNICATEDCASES%22]} (last visited Jan. 17, 2018).

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3