Report– Recent Case Law of theBundesgerichtshof(Federal Court of Justice) inStrafsachen(Criminal Law)

Author:

Esposito Antonio K.,Safferling Christoph J.M.

Abstract

Reporting on one year of theBundesgerichtshof's(BGH – Federal Court of Justice) jurisprudence in criminal affairs is always a delicate matter. We have decided to limit ourselves to report on a variety of cases, which are reported in the official records of the BGH and edited by members of the Court. The Court's official journal,Entscheidungen des Bundesgerichtshofs in Strafsachen(BGHSt), gives a fair mixture of decisions, which the judges themselves consider important enough to be included therein. However, the triage of decisions found there entails but a small portion of the BGH's work, chosen case-by-case without taking heed of producing a representative share. In order to come to a reasonable number of decisions to include in this report we had to leave aside several decisions notwithstanding their importance. We abstain from reporting on the case ofEl Motassadeq, who was charged with abetting in murder in 3066 cases in connection with the 9/11-attacks in the USA and was acquitted for lack of evidence. This case has been reported extensively elsewhere. We also desist from reporting on theGartenschlägercase, which deals with a special incident at the former German-German boarder. A survey of recent decisions of the BGH in the context of the former East-German regime was included in last year's report to the Annual for German and European Law (AGEL).

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Law

Reference112 articles.

1. See Matthias Jahn & Martin Müller, Der Widerspenstigen Zähmung, Aktuelle Gesetzgebungsvorschläge zu den Urteilsabsprachen im Strafprozess, Juristische Arbeitsblätter 681 (2006).

2. Under the auspices of natural positivism, see Franz von Liszt, Lehrbuch des Deutschen Strafrechts 158, 162 (14th&15th ed. 1905).

3. BGHSt 50, 121, 129–30.

4. BGHSt 50, 180, 182–185.

5. Gesetz (Act) of 23 July 2004 (BGBl. I S. 1838); see also BT-Drucks. 15/2887; critically reviewed by e.g. Jörg Kinzig, Umfassender Schutz vor dem gefährlichen Straftäter?: Das Gesetz zur Einführung der nachträglichen Sicherungsverwahrung, 24 NStZ 655 (2004); Klaus Laubenthal, Die Renaissance der Sicherungsverwahrung, 116 ZStW 703 (2004); and with a view to the ECHR: Joachim Renzikowski, Die nachträgliche Sicherungsverwahrung und die Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention, Juristische Rundschau (JR) 271 (2004).

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Reliability evaluation of a forensic expert's opinion: World practices and Ukrainian realities;Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine;2021-06-25

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3