The Meaning of Regulatory Act Explained: Are There Any Significant Improvements for the Standing of Non-Privileged Applicants in Annulment Actions?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The Meaning of Regulatory Act Explained: Are There Any Significant Improvements for the Standing of Non-Privileged Applicants in Annulment Actions?

Published:2013-09-01 Issue:9 Volume:14 Page:1851-1865
ISSN:2071-8322
Container-title:German Law Journal
language:en
Short-container-title:Ger. law j.

Author:

Roer-Eide Haakon,Eliantonio Mariolina

Abstract

The right to an effective legal remedy is a generally accepted principle of modern legal systems and is enshrined in national constitutions as well as international treaties, such as the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. On the European Union (hereinafter EU) level, the right to an effective remedy is laid down in Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Law

Reference78 articles.

1. Regiao autónoma dos Acores v. Council, CJEU Case T-37/04, 2008 E.C.R. II-103 (confirmed in appeal in Regiao autónoma dos Acores v. Council, CJEU Case C-444/08, 2009 E.C.R. I-200).

2. European Environmental Bureau (EEB) and Stichting Natuur en Milieu v. Commission, CJEU Case T-236/04 & T-241/04, 2005 E.C.R. II-04945; WWF-UK Ltd. V. Council, CJEU Case T-91/07, 2008 E.C.R. II-81 (confirmed in appeal in case WWF-UK v. Council, CJEU C-355/08 P, 2009 E.C.R. I-73); Regiao autónoma dos Acores v. Council, CJEU Case T-37/04, 2008 E.C.R. II-103 (confirmed in appeal in case Regiao autónoma dos Acores v. Council, CJEU C-444/08, 2009 E.C.R. I-200). For a closer examination of this case law, see Mariolina Eliantonio, Towards an Ever Dirtier Europe?: The Restrictive Standing of Environmental NGOs Before the European Courts and the Aarhus Convention, 7 Croatian Y.B. of Eur. L. & Pol'y 69 (2011); Marc Pallemaerts, Access to Environmental Justice at EU Level–Has the ‘Aarhus Regulation’ Improved the Situation?, in The Aarhus Convention at Ten—Interactions and Tensions between Conventional International Law and EU Environmental Law 287, 297 (Marc Pallemaerts ed., 2011).

3. Commission Regulation 1367/2006, 2006 O.J. (L264) 13.

4. Id.

5. Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami & Others v. European Parliament & Council of the European Union, CJEU Case T-18/10, 2011 E.C.R. II-05599, para. 51.