Author:
Preu Friederike Johanna,Richardson Benjamin J.
Abstract
In socially responsible investment terms, Germany is a contradiction. The country is considered by many as one of the pioneers of post-war environmentalism and social reform. Yet, German financial institutions are amongst the European laggards in adopting environmentally and socially informed approaches to investment. This article identifies a variety of legal, institutional and attitudinal factors which hinder the growth of the German SRI market. Its paltry size does not reflect evidence of any specific disinterest among German investors in social and environmental issues. Rather, it arises from a combination of structural impediments, particularly the institutional arrangements for German pension schemes that hinder their participation in financial markets, regulations which encourage conservative investments, and investors' preference for low-risk assets and avoidance of shareholder activism. Legal and institutional reforms over the past decade have in theory created better opportunities for SRI in Germany, although they have yet to engender significant changes in the market.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference267 articles.
1. Schaefer , supra note 68, 2.
2. Boersch-Supan & Wilke , supra note 70, 8.
3. Riedel Silke & Schneeweiss Antje , Chancen und Entwicklungsmoeglichkeiten fuer ein Aktives Aktionaerstum in Deutschland – eine Machbarkeitsstudie 12 (2008).
4. Schaefer , supra note 51, 283.
5. Schepers Donald & Sethi S. Prakash , Do Socially Responsible Funds Actually Deliver What they Promise? Bridging the Gap Between the Promise and Performance of Socially Responsible Funds, 108 Bus. & Soc. Rev. 11 (2003).
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献