Abstract
It is now almost two decades since the German Constitutional Court proclaimed inMaastrichtits capacity to review whether the Union institutions respect the limits of their conferred competences and to pronounce inapplicable at national level all legal instruments adopted by them in transgression of these boundaries. Thisultra viresdoctrine inspired the case law of several other constitutional courts, which announced their intention to operate in exceptional circumstances as anultima ratioagainst the violation by the Union institutions of the principle of conferral. The German Constitutional Court itself emphatically reaffirmed on various occasions its role as the ultimate protector of constitutionality against theultra viresintroduction and interpretation of Union law, most prominently in its eminentLisbonruling. Until recently though, there was no actual precedent of a national court proclaiming a Union act asultra vires.Even when a constitutional court reviewed the contested act onultra viresgrounds, it eventually concluded that it complied with the principle of conferred powers.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference60 articles.
1. Two preliminary references were made recently by the Spanish Constitutional Court in Case C-399/11 Criminal Proceedings against Stefano Melloni, O.J. 2011 C 290/5, and the Belgian Constitutional Court in Case C-197/2011 Eric Libert and Others v Flemish Government, O.J. 2011 C 211/13. Both cases are currently pending.
2. Judicial Non-Compliance in a Non-Hierarchical Legal Order: Isolated Accident or Omen of Judicial Armageddon?
3. This presupposes of course that the reference will be considered admissible, notwithstanding the complete ban on the future award of the social security supplement currently imposed by Czech law. This law continues to be applicable, since the position of the Constitutional Court that its provisions became obsolete was obiter dictum.
4. Case C-555/07 Seda Kücükdeveci v Swedex GmbH & Co. KG, [2010] ECR I-365. For more on this ruling, see its annotation by Anja Wiesbrock, Case Note – Case C-555/07, Kücükdeveci v. Swedex, Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 January 2010, 11 Germ. L. J. 539–550 (2010), available at: http://www.germanlawjournal.com/index.php?pageID=11&artID=1255 (last accessed: 27 June 2013). Also see the case note by Gregor Thüsing & Sally Horler in 47 Comm. Mkt. L. Rev. 1161 (2010).
5. Case C-253/12 JS v Česká správa sociálního zabezpečení, O.J. 2012 C 273/2. This preliminary reference was lodged on 24 May 2012.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献