Agencificationin the United States and Germany and What the EU Might Learn From It

Author:

Chamon Merijn

Abstract

In the European Union the legislature has, in the past years, established an increasing number of agencies, granting them increasingly important powers. This phenomenon of agencification is legally problematic because it does not have a legal basis in the EU Treaties. In order to better understand the challenges posed by EU agencification, this Article looks at similar agencification processes in two other federal-type polities, the U.S. and Germany. Germany is especially relevant to understanding the vertical (federal) dimension to EU agencification, while the U.S. experience can inform us about the horizontal (separation of powers) dimension. This is done by looking at three distinct issues: The question of the initial establishment of a new body at the EU (federal) level, the extent to which powers can be entrusted to such a body, and the degree to which the decisions adopted by such bodies are judicially scrutinized. The Article concludes that EU agencification poses a greater risk than agencification in Germany or the US because control is partially less well-established (compared to Germany) and because the EU polity is much less mature (compared to the U.S.).

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Law

Reference204 articles.

1. 1. Kelemen Daniel & Tarrant Andrew, The Political Foundations of the Eurocracy, 34 W. Eur. Pol. 922, 923 (2011)

2. See, e.g., Calabresi , infra note 94; Printz v. United States, 521 U.S. 898, 922–23 (1997).

3. A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States, 295 U.S. 495, 542 (1935). Justice Cardozo, who dissented in Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan, wrote a concurring opinion, setting out why he thought the two delegations were different and why the Schechter delegation did not conform to the limits he set out in Panama. See id. at 551–55.

4. This is the so called Ausführung als eigene Angelegenheit.

5. Wimmer , supra note 174, at 435.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3