Abstract
AbstractIncreasing research has been devoted to examining collaborations between public and private actors in environmental regulation under neoliberal democracies. However, this public-private interaction in authoritarian regimes remains understudied. This article seeks to address this gap in the literature through an empirical examination of the interaction between environmental non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and procuratorates in China's environmental public interest litigation. We find emerging complementarity: NGOs focus on new issues and target high-profile defendants to increase the socio-legal impact of their civil litigation, whereas procuratorates increasingly engage in administrative litigation against government agencies. This complementarity is shaped by the different legal opportunities for Chinese NGOs and procuratorates, as well as their respective institutional objectives and capacities. Their divergent regulatory preferences have also fostered synergy between these two actors, allowing them to collaborate on legal experimentation and innovation.
Funder
Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Reference28 articles.
1. Breathe Easy? Local Nuances of Authoritarian Environmentalism in China's Battle against Air Pollution;Shen;The China Quarterly,2018
2. Access to Justice: The Newest Wave in the Worldwide Movement to Make Rights Effective;Garth;Buffalo Law Review,1978
3. Narratives and Pathways towards an Ecological Civilization in Contemporary China
4. The Promise and Perils of Private Enforcement;Norris;Virginia Law Review,2022
5. The Role of the Judge in Public Law Litigation
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献