Abstract
AbstractThere is no definitive approach to assessing the effectiveness of international environmental regimes. In order to explore the regime established by the 1979 Geneva Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution this article broadly integrates the approach to effectiveness taken by Peter H. Sand inThe Effectiveness of International Environmental Agreements,and Daniel Bodansky inThe Art and Craft of International Environmental Law. The article finds that compliance, institutional, and normative effectiveness can be evaluated relatively confidently. An effectiveness assessment of the long-range transboundary air pollution (LRTAP) regime indicates that, on the whole, it has helped states to reach agreement on contentious issues and achieve results in air pollution reduction. However, it faces significant challenges with regard to participation, implementation procedures, empowerment of domestic stakeholders, and funding. The article provides an in-depth and up-to-date look at the LRTAP regime, including the most recent amendments and its relationship with European Union and international law.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Reference95 articles.
1. Environmental Modification: Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution;Heywood;Harvard International Law Journal,1980
2. SAVING THE WORLD? IMPLEMENTATION AND ENFORCEMENT OF INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW THROUGH INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTIONS
3. Monitoring European Transboundary Air Pollution;Dovland;Environment,1987
4. Soft Law, Hard Law, and Effective Implementation of International Environmental Norms
Cited by
20 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献