Abstract
AbstractEconomic arguments in support of linking emissions trading schemes suggest that such linking could provide access to lower cost abatement options and increase market stability. The decisions of whether and how to link emissions trading schemes often focus on the design features of the relevant schemes, but an additional factor which has the potential to undermine the efficiency of linked schemes is taxation. This article systematically tests two alternative approaches to the direct (income) taxation of cross-border transfers of emission allowances for differential tax outcomes. Four hypothetical transactions are considered under three different linking mechanisms and on the assumption that a tax treaty based on the OECD Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital is in force. This analysis evidences that, in some cases – and especially if the relevant jurisdictions adopt different approaches to the taxation of allowance transactions under domestic law – there is the potential for timing differences or double taxation that could impact on the efficiency of the linked trading schemes. It is therefore important for tax implications to be considered as part of any linking proposal.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Reference15 articles.
1. Accounting for Carbon Emission Allowances in the European Union: In Search of Consistency
2. Multinational taxation and international emissions trading
3. Approaches to the Taxation Treatment of Carbon Emission Allowances and Liabilities: Comparing the United Kingdom and Australia;Black;British Tax Review,2013
4. M. Ranson & R. Stavins, ‘Linkage of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading Systems: Learning from Experience’ (2016) 16(3) Climate Policy, pp. 284–300
5. Taxation and Multi-Period Global Cap and Trade;Kane;NYU Environmental Law Journal,2011
Cited by
20 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献