Non-Judicial, Advisory, Yet Impactful? The Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee as a Gateway to Environmental Justice

Author:

Samvel Gor

Abstract

AbstractIn accordance with Article 15 of the Aarhus Convention, the first meeting of the parties to this Convention established a non-judicial and consultative Compliance Committee to consider, among other matters, individual cases concerning compliance by parties with their obligations. The Committee is traditionally viewed as a non-judicial, soft mechanism and its rulings as non-binding, soft law. In recent years, however, to support the claim that rulings of the Committee have an impact and legal effects, some scholars have departed from the traditional perspective and characterized the Committee as a more judicialized mechanism, which issues legally binding rulings.This characterization assumes a correlation between judicialization and binding effect on the one hand, and legal effect on the other. The latter claim, however, has not been supported by a systematic assessment of the impact of the Committee's rulings on domestic practice. Against this background, the article assesses the impact of Article 9-related rulings of the Committee, issued between 2004 and 2012, on national legal orders. The assessment reveals that in fewer than 41% of the cases parties recorded some degree of compliance with the rulings of the Committee, whereas in 59% they recorded no progress. The quantitative assessment and respective qualitative insights, among other factors, suggest that the normative character of the Committee and its rulings play an auxiliary role in the process of ensuring compliance with the provisions of the Aarhus Convention. The decision of parties to comply is determined typically by the substance of the rulings as they stand in relation to domestic circumstances rather than by the institutional features of the Committee and binding effect of its rulings.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Law,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Reference29 articles.

1. A Europe of Rights

2. Means of Ensuring Compliance with and Enforcement of International Environmental Law;Wolfrum;Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law,1998

3. International Soft Law

4. “Soft Law”: Eine neue Form vom Völkerrecht;Thürer;Zeitschrift für schweizerisches Recht,1985

Cited by 20 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Compliance with Science-Based Treaties;International Courts versus Non-Compliance Mechanisms;2024-02-22

2. The New Generation of Environmental Non-Compliance Procedures and the Question of Legitimacy;International Courts versus Non-Compliance Mechanisms;2024-02-22

3. Specific Procedures;International Courts versus Non-Compliance Mechanisms;2024-02-22

4. General and Conceptual Issues;International Courts versus Non-Compliance Mechanisms;2024-02-22

5. How Can Indigenous Voices Be Maximized in Existing Mechanisms for Holding Multinational Corporations Accountable for Environmental Harm? A Study of International Environmental, Human Rights, and Investment Law Mechanisms Through the Inter-American Lens;SSRN Electronic Journal;2024

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3