Abstract
The screech noise generation process from supersonic underexpanded
jets, issuing
from a sonic nozzle at pressure ratios of 2.4 and 3.3 (fully expanded Mach
number,
Mj=1.19 and 1.42), was investigated experimentally.
The extremely detailed data
provide a fresh, new look at the screech generation mechanism. Spark schlieren
visualization at different phases of the screech cycle clearly shows the
convection of
the organized turbulent structures over a train of shock waves. The potential
pressure
field (hydrodynamic fluctuations) associated with the organized structures
is fairly
intense and extends outside the shear layer. The time evolution of the
near-field
pressure fluctuations was obtained from phase-averaged microphone measurements.
Phase-matched combined views of schlieren photographs and pressure fluctuations
show the sound generation process. The individual compression and rarefaction
parts of the sound waves are found to be generated from similar hydrodynamic
fluctuations. A partial interference between the upstream-propagating sound
waves
and the downstream-propagating hydrodynamic waves is found to be present
along
the jet boundary. The partial interference manifests itself as a standing
wave in the
root-mean-square pressure fluctuation data. The standing wavelength is
found to
be close to, but somewhat different from, the shock spacing. An outcome
of the
interference is a curious ‘pause and go’ motion of the sound
waves along the jet
periphery. Interestingly, a length scale identical to the standing wavelength
is found
to be present inside the jet shear layer. The coherent fluctuations and
the convective
velocity of the organized vortices are found to be modulated periodically,
and the
periodicity is found to match with the standing wavelength distance rather
than the
shock spacing. The reason for the appearance of this additional length
scale, different
from the shock spacing, could not be explained. Nevertheless, it is demonstrated
that an exact screech frequency formula can be derived from the simple
standing
wave relationship. The exact relationship shows that the correct spacing
between
the sources, for a point source model similar to that of Powell (1953),
should be a
standing wavelength (not the shock spacing).
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Mechanical Engineering,Mechanics of Materials,Condensed Matter Physics
Cited by
169 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献