Descriptive Evaluation of Antibody Responses to SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Plasma and Gingival Crevicular Fluid in a Nursing Home Cohort—Arkansas, June–August 2020
-
Published:2021-11-22
Issue:
Volume:
Page:1-24
-
ISSN:0899-823X
-
Container-title:Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol.
Author:
Brown Nicole E.ORCID, Lyons Amanda K.ORCID, Schuh Amy J.ORCID, Stumpf Megan M., Harcourt Jennifer L.ORCID, Tamin AzaibiORCID, Rasheed Mohammad Ata Ur, Mills Lisa, Lester Sandra N., Thornburg Natalie J.ORCID, Nguyen KennyORCID, Costantini Veronica, Vinjé JanORCID, Huang Jennifer Y.ORCID, Gilbert Sarah E.ORCID, Gable PaigeORCID, Bollinger Susan, Sabour SarahORCID, Beshearse ElizabethORCID, Surie DiyaORCID, Biedron Caitlin, Gregory Christopher J., Clemmons Nakia S.ORCID, Whitaker Brett, Coughlin Melissa M.ORCID, Seely Kathryn A., Garner Kelley, Gulley Trent, Haney Tafarra, Kothari Atul, Patil Naveen, Halpin Alison Laufer, McDonald L. Clifford, Kutty Preeta K., Brown Allison C.ORCID
Abstract
Abstract
Objective:
Characterize and compare SARS-CoV-2–specific immune responses in plasma and gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) from nursing home residents during and after natural infection
Design:
Prospective cohort
Setting:
Nursing home
Participants:
SARS-CoV-2–infected nursing home residents
Methods:
A convenience sample of 14 SARS-CoV-2–infected nursing home residents, enrolled 4–13 days after real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction diagnosis, were followed for 42 days. Post diagnosis, plasma SARS-CoV-2–specific pan-Immunoglobulin (Ig), IgG, IgA, IgM, and neutralizing antibodies were measured at 5 timepoints and GCF SARS-CoV-2–specific IgG and IgA were measured at 4 timepoints.
Results:
All participants demonstrated immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Among 12 phlebotomized participants, plasma was positive for pan-Ig and IgG in all 12, neutralizing antibodies in 11, IgM in 10, and IgA in 9. Among 14 participants with GCF specimens, GCF was positive for IgG in 13 and IgA in 12. Immunoglobulin responses in plasma and GCF had similar kinetics; median times to peak antibody response was similar across specimen types (4 weeks for IgG; 3 weeks for IgA). Participants with pan-Ig, IgG, and IgA detected in plasma and GCF IgG remained positive through this evaluation’s end 46–55 days post-diagnosis. All participants were viral culture negative by the first detection of antibodies.
Conclusions:
Nursing home residents had detectable SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in plasma and GCF after infection. Kinetics of antibodies detected in GCF mirrored those from plasma. Non-invasive GCF may be useful for detecting and monitoring immunologic responses in populations unable or unwilling to be phlebotomized.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Infectious Diseases,Microbiology (medical),Epidemiology
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|