Abstract
AbstractConventional theories of ethnic politics argue that political entrepreneurs form ethnic parties where there is ethnic diversity. Yet empirical research finds that diversity is a weak predictor for the success of ethnic parties. When does ethnicity become a major element of party competition? Scholars have explained the emergence of an ethnic dimension in party systems as the result of institutions, mass organizations, and elite initiatives. But these factors can evolve in response to an emerging ethnic coalition of voters. The author advances a new theory: ethnic cleavages emerge when voters seek to form a parliamentary opposition to government policies that create grievances along ethnic identities. The theory is tested on rare cases of government policies in Prussia between 1848 and 1874 that aggrieved Catholics but were not based on existing policies or initiated by entrepreneurs to encourage ethnic competition. Using process tracing, case comparisons, and statistical analysis of electoral returns, the author shows that Catholics voted together when aggrieved by policies, regardless of the actions of political entrepreneurs. In contrast, when policies were neutral to Catholics, the Catholic party dissolved.
Funder
Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation, University of Wisconsin--Madison
Election Research Center, University of Wisconsin--Madison
Graduate School, University of Wisconsin--Madison
Jean Monnet EU Center of Excellence, University of Wisconsin--Madison
The Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research and Graduate Education, University of Wisconsin--Madison
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference124 articles.
1. Counting Islam
2. Process-Tracing Research Designs: A Practical Guide;Ricks;PS: Political Science and Politics,2018
3. Dimensionality and the number of parties in legislative elections
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献