Abstract
Abstract:Existing discussions about shareholder control work with a state-centric and Westphalian conception of democracy. Therefore, they see the corporation as a state-analogue: shareholders (citizens) elect a board (legislature) charged with the responsibility to ensure that the executive follows their ‘collective interest’. We claim that state-centric models of democracy are not apt for an environment of corporate governance characterised by complex interdependence, porous boundaries, and criss-crossing relations of weak allegiances. Instead, we suggest that recent theories of transnational democracy provide us with better models for thinking about ‘popular’ control in such an environment. We look at shareholder democracy not as a system where a single body representing a ‘demos’ tries to control a single executive; instead, we view shareholders as constituting multipledêmoiwhich must coordinate and collaborate to control multiple corporate executives. We emphasise deliberation and communicative power as a central mechanism for thesedêmoiof shareholders to effectuate control.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Philosophy,History
Reference58 articles.
1. ‘The Ordinary Business Operations Exception to the Shareholder Proposal Rule: A Return to Predictability’;Waite;Fordham Law Review,1995
2. ‘Social Conceptions of the Corporation: Insights from the History of Shareholder Voting Rights’;Dunlavy;Washington and Lee Law Review,2006
3. In Defense of Workplace Democracy
4. From Hired Hands to Co-Owners: Compensation, Team Production, and the Role of the CEO
5. ‘Free Speech in an Economic Perspective’;Posner;Suffolk University Law Review,1986
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献