Abstract
AbstractThe essay attempts to recover a language of liberty, a set of assumptions common participants in the mid-seventeenth-century discourse on religion and liberty. The current historiography of seventeenth-century liberty and contemporary consensus on the complementarity civil liberty and law are used as contexts. In the religious sense, liberty was commonly taken to imply submission to the will of a God of millennial purpose and providential power. In the struggle for appropriate submission to such divine authority issues of freedom arose in the Pauline paradoxes service as perfect freedom and in the process of liberation from inappropriate authorities. The polarization of liberty and authority in traditional accounts of the puritan revolution, the reduction of religious liberty to an element within a greater struggle over constitutional forms, and the identification of religious liberty with individual and corporate rights are called in question.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference207 articles.
1. London Levellers in the English Revolution: the Chidleys and Their Circle
2. Puritanism and Social Control?
3. Rogers John , Sagrir (1653)
4. the Royal law of love and Christian moderation;Abbott;Writings and speeches
Cited by
115 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Against Antiformalism;Common Knowledge;2023-09-01
2. <i>The Postsecular Restoration and the Making of Literary Conservatism</i>;2022-12-22
3. Index;The English Republican Exiles in Europe during the Restoration;2020-10-19
4. Bibliography;The English Republican Exiles in Europe during the Restoration;2020-10-19
5. Epilogue;The English Republican Exiles in Europe during the Restoration;2020-10-19