Abstract
ABSTRACTTwo very powerful stories structure the history of the changing roles of English women. The tale of the nineteenth-century separation of the spheres of public power and private domesticity relates principally to the experience of middle-class women. The other story, emerging from early modern scholarship, recounts the social and economic marginalization of propertied women and the degradation of working women as a consequence of capitalism. Both narratives echo each other in important ways, although strangely the capacity of women's history to repeat itself is rarely openly discussed. This paper critically reviews the two historiographies in order to open debate on the basic categories and chronologies we employ in discussing the experience, power and identity of women in past time.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference175 articles.
1. Kerber , ‘Rhetoric of women's history’, pp. 18–19
2. The Use and Abuse of Anthropology: Reflections on Feminism and Cross-Cultural Understanding
3. Vickery , Thesis, pp. 131–74, 278–331
4. Vickery , ‘Thesis’, pp. 175–219
Cited by
697 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献