Abstract
Health care is being capitated throughout the United States, and much of the spread of capitation is attributable to the efforts of insurers to contain costs. The present lack of comprehensive studies evaluating the impact of capitation on overall health care quality leaves vast room for speculation.Capitation does, however, carry a very fundamental certainty with broad implications. Whether the arrangement calls for a fixed sum for treating a particular ailment, a set fee for meeting all of an individual patient’s health care needs, or a standard charge for supplying all the medication for a specific condition, capitation sets limits. Because the health care costs for any given patient or condition are in reality zero-sum rather than fixed, capitation is about pooling patients and rationing. It involves denying services to some patients despite a general contractual commitment to coverage, presumably so that more patients can be covered or receive better care. The implications of capitation are even more significant when set fully in the context of the overall health care reform now underway. Simultaneously and comprehensively, health care is being managed, made for-profit, and consolidated.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,General Medicine,Health(social science)
Reference107 articles.
1. Cutbacks to Shift Health Costs to Workers;Knox;Boston Globe,1995
2. The Doctor's Master
3. Are We More Than the Sum of Our Genes?;Weiss;Wash. Post,1995
4. cf . Paul Starr, The Social Transformation of American Medicine 22 (1982)
5. Northeast Living: When Time Runs Out on Fertility;Sheehy;Oregonian (Portland),1995
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献