Abstract
Modern American medicine is far from ideal. Physicians practice by rules learned in medical school, rules often based on anecdotes or untested hypotheses. Medical opinion leaders shape practice by their own experience even though anecdotes are no substitute for clinical studies. Pressures to diagnose and treat come from pharmaceutical companies, equipment manufacturers, hospitals and managed care organizations (MCOs). The end result is often too much medicine or too little, but rarely the appropriate amount. Patients can end up suffering iatrogenic effects of infections picked up during hospital stays, complications from surgery or drug side effects or “cascade effects” that occur when several interventions fail in succession.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,General Medicine,Health (social science)
Reference24 articles.
1. How Coronary Angiography Is Used
2. Shortell, Stephen M. & LoGerfo, James P. , Hospital Medical Staff Organization and Quality of Care: Results for Myocardial Infarction and Appendectomy, 19 Med. Care 1041 (1981)
3. The NCQA's Quality Compass: Evaluating Managed Care In The United States
4. Dudley, R. Adams et al., The Impact of Financial Incentives on Quality of Health Care, 76 Milbank Q. 649, 668 (1998)
5. Trevino, Lu Ann , Note, The Health Care Quality Improvement Act: Sword or Shield?, 22 T. Marshall L. Rev. 315, 342 (1997)
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献