Abstract
In the context of the bicentennial of the Constitution and science's relationship to society, it has been argued that “the advance of science and technology in the West has changed not only the relation of man to nature but of man to man.“ This seemingly immodest statement may soon prove an understatement. In the arena of human reproduction, the marriage of science and technology in medicine may change not only the relationship of man to nature and man to man, but more significantly, the very concept of what it means to be human. This, in turn, will directly affect how we define the “rights” this “new human” may properly claim.This article begins to explore developing reproductive medical technology with a view toward examining the way it might change our concept of humanness, and how this change might be accommodated, encouraged, or truncated by the relationship between the government and its pregnant citizens as defined by the United States Constitution and the “right to privacy.”
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,General Medicine,Health (social science)
Reference19 articles.
1. Rethinking Sex and the Constitution,;Law;U. PA. L. REV. 955,,1984
2. The Advance of Science and Its Burdens in Art and Science;Holton;DAEDALUS,1986
3. The Judge in the Delivery Room: The Emergence of Court-Ordered Cesareans
4. At Law: She's Going to Die: The Case of Angela C
5. Embryos, Families and Promotive Liberty: The Legal Structure of the New Reproduction,;Robertson;So. CAL. L. REV.,1986
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Court-visited obstetrical and fertility procedures;Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics;2012-01-21
2. Ethical Dilemmas in Obstetrics and Gynaecology;Dewhurst's Textbook of Obstetrics & Gynaecology;2012-01-05