1. A coherent overview of competing definitions, and how they have evolved, is to be found in R. Mayntz, New Challenges to Governance Theory (Florence: European University Institute 1998, The Robert Schuman Centre, Jean Monnet Chair Papers 50).
2. Ibid., 18 et seq., see also 16.
3. Out of the rich literature on the public/private divide see in particular W. Streeck/ Ph.C. Schmitter (eds.), Private Interest Government. Beyond Market and State (London: Sage 1985); W. Streeck (ed.), Staat und Verbände, special issue 25 of Politische Vierteljahresschrift 35 (1994) 1–401. On the international dimension see in particular A. Hasenclever/P. Mayer/V. Rittberger, Theories of International Regimes (Cambridge Studies in International Relations 55, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1997); M. Hewson/T.J. Sinclair (eds.), Approaches to Global Governance Theory (New York: State University of New York Press 1999).
4. For more on the extraterritorial application of national public law see A.K. Schnyder, Wirtschaftskollisionsrecht. Sonderanknüpfung und extraterritoriale Anwendung wirtschaftsrechtlicher Normen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Marktrecht (Zürich: Schulthess 1990); W. Meng, Extraterritoriale Jurisdiktion im öffentlichen Wirtschaftsrecht (Berlin: Springer 1994).
5. This is not obvious at first sight. For the details see Lehmann, “Private Institutions in Waste Management Policy and Their Antitrust Implications. The Case of Germany’s Dual Management System”, Preprints aus der Max-Planck-Projektgruppe Recht der Gemeinschaftsgüter Bonn: 1999/13.