Developing States and International Environmental Law: The Importance of Differentiated Responsibilities

Author:

French Duncan

Abstract

The protection of the global environment has become one of the central objectives of the international community in recent decades. Issues such as climate change, the depletion of the ozone layer, and the loss of the biological diversity has resulted in a growing international awareness of the problems facing the planet. Moreover, there is also recognition that States will need to act more collaboratively at the international level if effective solutions are to be found to these problems. However, concurrently there is also recognition that many States have pressing socio-economic concerns of their own, and that they have neither the resources nor the capabilities with which to devote to such global issues—so called “developing” States. This article examines the response of international environmental law to these two, potentially opposing, trends, viz., the need for universalism, on the one hand, and sensitivity to the needs of developing States, on the other. In particular, the article will examine the emerging legal principle of “common but differentiated responsibilities”, as well as discussing the various means of operationalising it. Nevertheless, as will be discussed below, there is still much debate as to the conceptual basis of this principle—leading one to question its real aim. Is it to contribute to a fairer world system in which developed States recognise their historical responsibility for past environmental damage, or is it simply an expedient means of ensuring the participation of developing States in what are primarily Northern concerns?

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Law,Political Science and International Relations

Reference19 articles.

1. Jordan A. , The International Organisational Machinery for Sustainable Development (1993), 7. Arguably, the effect of such “sweeteners” can be seen in the fact that many more developing States acceded to the Montreal Protocol after 1990, than other environmental conventions, such as the 1979 Bonn Convention, which contain little or no differentiation.

2. Handl G. , “Environmental Security and Global Change: The Challenge to International Law” (1990) I Y.I.E.L. 9

3. Anand R. , Confrontation or Cooperation? International Law and Developing Countries (1987), 45

Cited by 31 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Sustainable Development and the Paradox of Legal Universalism;Sustainable Development, International Law, and a Turn to African Legal Cosmologies;2024-05-23

2. Universal, Pluriversal, and in Between;Sustainable Development, International Law, and a Turn to African Legal Cosmologies;2024-05-23

3. Innovating Regional Policy Frameworks in China: The Strategic Zone + Type Zone Model for Sustainable Growth;Journal of the Knowledge Economy;2024-05-20

4. A critical appraisal of the BBNJ agreement not to recognise the high seas decline as a common concern of humankind;Marine Policy;2024-05

5. The Application of the Principle of Common but Differentiated Responsibilities in Environmental Governance on the High Seas;Chinese Journal of International Law;2024-03-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3