Abstract
AbstractThis article critically examines the role of the Immovable Property Commission, established in 2005 by the ‘Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus’ under pressure from the European Court of Human Rights, to redress losses sustained by Greek Cypriots who fled south when the island was partitioned in the mid-1970s. While the Commission has been a modest success, proceedings have been lengthy, its decisions lack transparency, there have been difficulties with restitution and exchange, and the payment of compensation has often been delayed. Corporate ownership and encumbrances, such as mortgages, have also proved problematic. But, whether it contributes negatively or positively to full resolution of the Cyprus problem, or makes no contribution at all, remains to be seen.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Political Science and International Relations
Reference6 articles.
1. Tackling Political Disputes through Individual Applications;White;EHRLR,1998
2. Minority Rights in North Cyprus;Dayıoğlu;Turkish Cypriot Human Rights Foundation Publications,2012
3. Cyprus: Peace, Return and Property;Sert;JRS,2010
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献