Abstract
AbstractDuring the COVID-19 pandemic the international community repeatedly called for the equitable distribution of vaccines and other medical countermeasures. However, there was a substantial gap between this rhetoric and State action. High-income countries secured significantly more doses than they required, leaving many low-income countries unable to vaccinate their populations. Current negotiations for the new Pandemic Treaty under the World Health Organization (WHO) attempt to narrow the gap between rhetoric and behaviour by building the concept of equity into the Treaty's substantive content. However, equity is difficult to define, much less to operationalize. Presently, WHO Member States appear to have chosen ‘access and benefit-sharing’ (ABS) as the predominant mechanism for operationalizing equity in the Treaty. This article examines ABS as a mechanism, its use in public health, and argues that ABS is fundamentally flawed, unable to achieve equity. It proposes other options for an equitable international response to future pandemic threats.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Political Science and International Relations
Reference24 articles.
1. Equitable Principles from the Perspective of International Law of the Sea;Fahmy;EconLPoly,2018
2. Access to Genetic Resources and Benefit Sharing: Implications of Nagoya Protocol on Providers and Users;Kariyawasam;JWIP,2018
3. ARGUMENTS AGAINST THE INEQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION OF VACCINES USING THE ACCESS AND BENEFIT SHARING TRANSACTION
4. Genetic Resources as Natural Information
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献