Abstract
Several restrictions on successive cyclicwh-movement appear not to be exclusively linked to general principles of the grammar, but seem to be in some sense lexically determined. It has been pointed out repeatedly thatwh-movement of subjects and adjuncts out of complement CPs of factive verbs strongly contrasts withwh-movement of internal arguments out of these CPs (Rouveret, 1980; Kayne, 1981; Zubizarreta, 1982; Adams, 1985): (1) (a) *Who do you regret/understand/forget likes this book? (= Adams, 1985: (4b)) (b) *How did he deeply regret that his son had fixed the car? (c) ?Which article did you regret/understand/forget that I had selected?
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Philosophy,Language and Linguistics
Reference48 articles.
1. Hirschbühler Paul (1978). The syntax and semantics of wh-constructions. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts.
2. Heim Irene (1982). The semantics of definite and indefinite NPs. Ph.D. dissertation, GLSA, Amherst.
Cited by
18 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. On Coordination and Clitic Climbing in Spanish Auxiliary Verb Constructions;Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics;2022-05-01
2. Clausal embedding in Washo: Complementation vs. modification;Natural Language & Linguistic Theory;2021-12-07
3. Intervention Effects;The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Semantics;2020-11-04
4. Chapter 5. Illusory islands;Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Vietnamese Linguistics;2019-10-09
5. What usage can tell us about grammar: Embedded verb second in Scandinavian;Glossa: a journal of general linguistics;2019-08-27