Abstract
AbstractIn 2006, a “tolerance policy” was launched in St. Petersburg to address the growing xenophobia and the need to integrate labor migrants. Applying a bottom–up perspective, this study finds that this policy was symbolic – aimed at changing public attitudes, not at providing material outcomes. The direct implementers (the street-level bureaucracy), operating under governmental constraints, drew on informal mechanisms: behind-the-scenes negotiations, unwritten rules and hierarchies, personalist power, and ideological cues. Formalized dense reporting, often quantitative, was used to keep low-level implementers in check. The combination of these features rendered the tolerance policy shallow and self-locked. Street-level bureaucracy had to interpret vague policy documents, but lacked the necessary discretionary powers. This gave rise to the kartinka (picture, or image) coping technique. The term describes how all work activities were shaped by the need to demonstrate progress with respect to unwritten rules and ideological dynamics. The article concludes with a discussion of the applicability of the author’s findings to the field of nationalities policy in Russia.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,History,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference128 articles.
1. Living in the Past? Change and Continuity in the Norwegian Central Civil Service
2. Xenophobia and Ethnopolitical Extremism in Post-Soviet Russia: Dynamics and Growth Factors
3. Koroleva, Marina . 2012. “Komu Doverit’ Adaptatsiiu Migrantov?,” Echo of Moscow, August 29, 2012. https://echo.msk.ru/programs/poehali/923936-echo/.
4. Smirnova, Elena . 2012. “Iz Pokolenia v Pokolenie.” Ekspert, November 26, 2012. https://expert.ru/northwest/2012/47/iz-pokoleniya-v-pokolenie/.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献