Abstract
Audit is the critical evaluation of medical practice to effect an improvement in quality of service. Quality has been described as ‘getting it right the first time’ and audit as asking ‘whether you are doing the right thing and you doing it right?’. Surgeons are acutely aware of the penalty paid by the patient when he ‘gets it wrong’. Immediate complications such as wound infection and anastomotic leakage may require additional therapy, delay discharge from hospital, necessitate further surgery or even lead to death. Late complications may result in recurrence of the presenting pathology or complications which cause more distress than the original disease. Surgery and audit seem to be closely linked and naturally associated. Surgical skills have developed immeasurably, no doubt accelerated by the realisation of the penalties of failure. Fortunately the cost of poor performance to the surgeon is no longer to have ones hand cut off as it was in 1750 BC under the rule of King Hammurabi of Babylonia.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference52 articles.
1. A time for decisions
2. Patient evaluation and complications of day case heriorrhaphy under local anaesthetic;Davies;Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons Edinburgh,1989
3. Caseload or workload? Scoring complexity of operative procedures as a means of analysing workload.
4. Surgical scoring, risk assessment and the surgeon;Copeland;Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons Edinburgh,1992
5. A new method of auditing surgical mortality rates: application to a group of elderly general surgical patients.