Model risk – daring to open up the black box

Author:

Aggarwal A.,Beck M. B.,Cann M.,Ford T.,Georgescu D.,Morjaria N.,Smith A.,Taylor Y.,Tsanakas A.,Witts L.,Ye I.

Abstract

AbstractWith the increasing use of complex quantitative models in applications throughout the financial world, model risk has become a major concern. Such risk is generated by the potential inaccuracy and inappropriate use of models in business applications, which can lead to substantial financial losses and reputational damage. In this paper, we deal with the management and measurement of model risk. First, a model risk framework is developed, adapting concepts such as risk appetite, monitoring, and mitigation to the particular case of model risk. The usefulness of such a framework for preventing losses associated with model risk is demonstrated through case studies. Second, we investigate the ways in which different ways of using and perceiving models within an organisation both lead to different model risks. We identify four distinct model cultures and argue that in conditions of deep model uncertainty, each of those cultures makes a valuable contribution to model risk governance. Thus, the space of legitimate challenges to models is expanded, such that, in addition to a technical critique, operational and commercial concerns are also addressed. Third, we discuss through the examples of proxy modelling, longevity risk, and investment advice, common methods and challenges for quantifying model risk. Difficulties arise in mapping model errors to actual financial impact. In the case of irreducible model uncertainty, it is necessary to employ a variety of measurement approaches, based on statistical inference, fitting multiple models, and stress and scenario analysis.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty,Economics and Econometrics,Statistics and Probability

Reference29 articles.

1. Über empirische Funktionen und die Interpolation zwischen äquidistanten Ordinaten;Runge;Zeitschrift für Mathematik und Physik,1901

2. A Value-at-Risk framework for longevity trend risk

3. Haldane A. & Madouros V. (2012). ‘The dog and the frisbee’, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City’s 36th Economic Policy Symposium, available at http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/Documents/speeches/2012/speech596.pdf (accessed 26 February 2015).

4. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (2011). SR 11-7: guidance on model risk management, available at http://www.federalreserve.gov/bankinforeg/srletters/sr1107a1.pdf (accessed 26 February 2015).

5. Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Policy

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3