Abstract
Criminal cases against domestic violence in India frequently result in unlawful “compromises” where litigants breach legal procedure and negotiate out-of-court settlements. Using ethnographic and interview data, this Article analyzes how legal cases become extralegal settlements. I argue that India’s legal environment engenders an “aspirational-strategic” legal consciousness among survivors, who simultaneously believe they deserve what the law promises while distrusting legal procedure and law enforcement personnel. Their bifurcated vision of the law leads them to negotiate illicit settlements. These findings indicate that expansions in legal rights can have contradictory effects on rule of law. Depending on the political economy of the legal institutional environment, citizens may respond to rights by simultaneously adopting new norms while ignoring legal rules and procedure.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,General Social Sciences
Reference105 articles.
1. A Research Study on the Use and Misuse of Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code;Center for Social Research,2005
2. BPRD. Data on Police Organizations as of January 1, 2015. Edited by Bureau of Police Research & Development. New Delhi: Government of India, 2015.
3. Law and Social Movements: Contemporary Perspectives
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献