Author:
Linder Christian,Farahbakhsh Siavash
Abstract
ABSTRACTDespite the extensive literature on what questionable research practices (QRPs) are and how to measure them, the normative underpinnings of such practices have remained less explored. QRPs often fall into a grey area of justifiable and unjustifiable practices. Where to precisely draw the line between such practices challenges individual scholars and this harms science. We investigate QRPs from a normative perspective using the theory of communicative action. We highlight the role of the collective in assessing individual behaviours. Our contribution is a framework that allows identification of when particular actions cross over from acceptable to unacceptable practice. Thus, this article provides grounds for developing scientific standards to raise the quality of scientific research.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Philosophy,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference84 articles.
1. Kant's Ethical Thought
2. A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp values
3. Publication decisions and their possible effects on inferences drawn from tests of significance - or vice versa;Sterling;Journal of the American Statistical Association,1959
4. Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献