The origin of modern astronomical theories of tides: Chrisogono, de Dominis and their sources

Author:

Bonelli Federico,Russo Lucio

Abstract

From the Renaissance to the seventeenth century the phenomenon of tidal motion constituted one of the principal arguments of scientific debate. Understanding the times for high and low water was of course often essential for navigation, but local variations (which nowadays are attributed to currents, coastal configurations, prevailing winds, seabed shaping and other geographic characteristics) made an inductive approach impractical and precluded the possibility of constructing a universally valid model for predicting these times. Notwithstanding the complexity of the phenomenon and its practical import, however, the early-modern theory of tidal ebb and flow, as clearly emerges from Duhem's analysis, appears to be neither the result of the interpretation of empirical data, nor aimed to their prediction. Rather, the interest in tides was of a theoretical nature and was aroused particularly by their double nature, being at the same time variable and regular, terrestrial and astronomical.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

History and Philosophy of Science,History

Reference106 articles.

1. Almagià , op. cit. (3), 461 ff.

2. Geography, III 5, 9).

3. Chrisogono , op. cit. (14) ‘decimaquarta conclusio’, fol. 27r.

4. Chrisogono , op. cit. (14)

Cited by 23 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Handling "Occult Qualities" in the Scientific Revolution;MEDIEV EARLY MOD PHI;2023-01-05

2. Introduction;Handling "Occult Qualities" in the Scientific Revolution;2022-12-12

3. Discussing Tides Before and After Newton: Roger Joseph Boscovich’sDe aestu maris;Perspectives on Science;2022

4. Croatian Renaissance Philosophy;Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy;2022

5. Flow and Ebb in Renaissance Science;Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy;2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3