Optimal design for network mutual aid

Author:

Li JingchaoORCID,Fang Zichen,Nie CiyuORCID,Chen Sizhe

Abstract

AbstractNetwork mutual aid platforms is one of the popular risk-sharing models in recent years, and they have almost 200 million members in China. However, current mutual aid platforms does not satisfy the actuarial rules in either the apportionment method or the pricing principle. Hence, a variety of mutual aid models which enable mutual aid members with different risks to exchange their risks in a transparent and actuarial fair way have been proposed in this paper. Besides, the decision-making frameworks for participants choosing between the mutual aid platform and similar insurance products, or choosing no risk sharing are constructed, respectively. Decisions are made based on the principle of maximizing expected utility. Moreover, the optimization problems of maximizing profit and minimizing risk are constructed, respectively. Through the principle of individual fairness and relative fairness, the problem of adverse selection of the platform can also be reduced. Finally, the actual mutual aid plan is compared with similar insurance products to discuss the advantages of the optimized plan.

Funder

National Key R&D Program of China

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Management Science and Operations Research,Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty,Statistics and Probability

Reference30 articles.

1. Asset preference, skewness, and the measurement of expected utility

2. [8] Chen, Z. , Feng, R. , Wei, L. , Zhao, J. (2021). From ex ante to ex post risk sharing: Cost-effectiveness, unfairness and adverse selection in mutual aid. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3925904.

3. [16] Eeckhoudt, L.R. & Laeven, R.J. (2015). Risk Aversion in the Small and in the Large under Rank-Dependent Utility. Preprint arXiv:1512.08037.

4. Optimal investment and reinsurance strategies for insurers with generalized mean–variance premium principle and no-short selling;Zhang;Insurance: Mathematics and Economics,2016

5. Risk sharing with multiple indemnity environments

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3