Do Voters Prefer Just Any Descriptive Representative? The Case of Multiracial Candidates

Author:

Lemi Danielle CasarezORCID

Abstract

Although scholars of representation have examined variation in voter support conditional on shared demographic traits, we know little about how voters respond to candidates who belong to multiple racial categories. Multiracial candidates challenge how we think about and study representation. I theorize that multiracial categories provide mixed information about how well a candidate adheres to group norms of identity, resulting in a multiracial advantage across groups, but a disadvantage within groups. A conjoint survey experiment on 786 White, Black, Asian, and Hispanic voters and a separate analysis of support for a multiracial candidate in a real-world election support these claims. Thus, multiracial candidates have the advantage of building coalitions with voters from other groups, but they are disadvantaged when appealing to co-racials with strong racial identities. These findings demonstrate that future research on representation must engage multiracial elites.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Political Science and International Relations

Reference161 articles.

1. Henderson, Nia-Malika . 2015. “Is Kamala Harris the Next Barack Obama? Washington Post, January 15. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/01/14/kamala-harris-democrats-next-big.-thing/.

2. Deracialization as an Analytical Construct in American Urban Politics

3. Preferable Descriptive Representatives: Will Just Any Woman, Black, or Latino Do?

4. Gender Targeting in Political Advertisements

Cited by 22 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Black representation and the popular legitimacy of the Federal Reserve;European Journal of Political Economy;2024-12

2. Skin Tone and the Moderating Effect of Partisanship on Assessments of Elected Officials of Color;Political Behavior;2024-03-14

3. Descriptive or Partisan Representation? Examining Trade-Offs for Asian Americans;SSRN Electronic Journal;2024

4. Intersectional Representation: Theory and Practice;Comparative Studies of Political Agendas;2024

5. Conclusions;Comparative Studies of Political Agendas;2024

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3