Abstract
Although scholars of representation have examined variation in voter support conditional on shared demographic traits, we know little about how voters respond to candidates who belong to multiple racial categories. Multiracial candidates challenge how we think about and study representation. I theorize that multiracial categories provide mixed information about how well a candidate adheres to group norms of identity, resulting in a multiracial advantage across groups, but a disadvantage within groups. A conjoint survey experiment on 786 White, Black, Asian, and Hispanic voters and a separate analysis of support for a multiracial candidate in a real-world election support these claims. Thus, multiracial candidates have the advantage of building coalitions with voters from other groups, but they are disadvantaged when appealing to co-racials with strong racial identities. These findings demonstrate that future research on representation must engage multiracial elites.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations
Reference161 articles.
1. Henderson, Nia-Malika . 2015. “Is Kamala Harris the Next Barack Obama? Washington Post, January 15. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/01/14/kamala-harris-democrats-next-big.-thing/.
2. Deracialization as an Analytical Construct in American Urban Politics
3. Preferable Descriptive Representatives: Will Just Any Woman, Black, or Latino Do?
4. Gender Targeting in Political Advertisements
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献