Abstract
I examine the political consequences of prison development in the United States. I theorize that the prison apparatus not only upholds a system of racial hierarchy and class stratification, but also links the economic stability of lower-class, rural whites to the continued penal confinement of poor, urban minorities. Analysis of an original dataset suggests that local reliance on existing prison infrastructure throughout many economically-depressed rural communities strengthens political support for harsh criminal punishments and militates against reform efforts. Political representatives have powerful interests in protecting rural prison investments, regardless of their actual economic impact in host communities. The evidence indicates that rural prison development contributes to the perceived economic viability and political power of rural areas, while reinforcing forms of punishment that destabilize poor urban neighborhoods and harm politically marginalized populations.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations
Reference108 articles.
1. Bureau of Prisons, Facility Locator, accessed at http://www.bop.gov/DataSource/execute/dsFacilityLoc
2. “Rural Prisons: An Update.”;Beale;Rural Development Perspectives,1993
3. The Economic Impacts of the Prison Development Boom on Persistently Poor Rural Places
4. Grissom Brandi . 2013. “In Two Cities, Opposite Reactions to State Jail Closings.” Texas Tribune, August 2.
5. The Process of Policy Innovation: Prison Sitings in Rural North Carolina
Cited by
32 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献