Abstract
Michael Mosser's thoughtful essay calls on us as political scientists to engage more closely with the contemporary US military. To weigh the implications of such a proposal, we need to consider, I think, not just the military but the wider, deeper processes of militarization. As a multi-layered economic, political, and cultural process, militarization can be blatant and off-putting; but just as often it can be subtle and seductive. All of us trying to craft the best practices of political science here in the United States in the early decades of the twenty-first century are making those scholarly efforts at a time when militarization is a potent process in American public life. Awareness of its potency breeds scholarly caution.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations
Reference23 articles.
1. Hasting Michael . 2010. “Runaway General,” Rolling Stone, (June 22). (http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/17390/119236) accessed July 13, 2010.
2. Obama Barak . 2010. “Text of Barak Obama's Oval Office Address.” Wall Street Journal, June 15. (http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2010/06/15/text-of-barak-obamas-oval-office-address), accessed June 16, 2010.
3. How Identities and Movement Cultures Became Deeply Saturated with Militarism: Lessons from the Pro-democracy Movement in South Korea;Kwon;Asian Journal of Women's Studies,2005
Cited by
18 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献