Abstract
This article argues that international regime complexity has shaped Europe's politics of human rights trade conditionality by creating opportunities for various types of “forum shopping,” and, consequently, that some of the most significant politics of human rights enforcement have occurred in an entirely separate issue area—trade—which are being worked out partly during lawmaking and partly during implementation. The presence of nested and overlapping institutions creates incentives for rival political actors—whether states, institutions, or policymakers—to (1) forum shop for more power, (2) advantage themselves in the context of a parallel or overlapping regime, and (3) invoke institutions á la carte to govern a specific issue but not others. Each tactic creates competition between institutions and actors for authority over the rules, setting hurdles for IO performance. Even so, (4) regime complexity can make enforcement of rules that are impossible to implement in one area possible in another area.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations
Reference12 articles.
1. Trading Human Rights: How Preferential Trade Agreements Influence Government Repression
2. European Report. 1997. EU/Australia: Minister Fails to Solve Wrangle on Human Rights Clause. February 1.
3. European Council. 2003. EU Annual Human Rights Report, 10 October 2003.
4. Human Rights Conditionality in the EU's International Agreements
Cited by
51 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献