Abstract
AbstractAlthough Brexit had its short-term roots in economic and constitutional legitimation issues, it cannot be explained without considering the European geopolitical space, the EU's contrasting political formations in the security and economic spheres, and the fault lines these produce. Seen from a long-term geopolitical perspective, there have been recurrent problems in Britain's efforts to deal with the EU and its predecessors, and persistent patterns of crisis. The geopolitical environment, especially around NATO and energy security in the Middle East, first rendered non-membership of the EEC a problem, then made entry impossible for a decade, helped make EU membership politically very difficult for British governments to sustain, and then constrained the May governments’ Article 50 negotiations. These problems have a singularly British shape, but they cannot be separated from more general fault lines in the European geopolitical space.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science
Reference72 articles.
1. Reuters (2020) France: More Countries Back European-Led Naval Mission in Hormuz. 20 January. https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-mideast-iran-france/france-more-countries-back-european-led-naval-mission-in-hormuz-idUKKBN1ZJ1AI (accessed 20 April 2020).
2. Brexit and European Security
3. House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee (2012) UK–Turkey Relations and Turkey's Regional Role. Twelfth Report of Session 2010–12, 4 April. HC1567.
4. What IsSui GenerisAbout the European Union? Costly International Cooperation in a Self-Contained Regime
5. America, Brexit and the security of Europe
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献