Author:
FRERICKS PATRICIA,HÖPPNER JULIA
Abstract
ABSTRACTEuropean welfare states used to be based on the principle of the family. Since the 1990s, however, ‘individual responsibility’ has been promoted, which fundamentally alters the traditional welfare-institutional framing of the family and the corresponding construction of the social citizen. One policy field that has been heavily influenced by this development is old-age security. The literature assumes a convergence towards institutional individualisation. We show this however to be incorrect. We empirically analyse and classify welfare-institutional change in old-age security with regard to individualisation. An innovative methodological approach for institutional analysis allows a nuanced identification of the welfare-institutional trends towards individualisation of the social citizen above pension age both within and between welfare states. We conclude that there has been no general and no partial convergence towards individualisation. Instead, on average, family elements in old-age security have either increased or persisted. Also, our analysis suggests that welfare-institutional change with regard to family is far from being a linear process and in part even displays contradictions.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Geriatrics and Gerontology,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Social Psychology,Health (social science)
Reference36 articles.
1. HISTORICAL INSTITUTIONALISM IN COMPARATIVE POLITICS
2. Is there convergence in convergence research? an overview of empirical studies on policy convergence
3. Goedemé T. 2012. Less is more? 20 years of changing minimum income protection for old Europe's elderly. CSB Working Paper 12/07. University of Antwerp, Antwerp.
4. Gilbert N. and Van Voorhis R. 2003. Changing Patterns of Social Protection. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献