Abstract
SummaryAlthough wildlife management models across the world have since the early 1980s shifted from top-down fortress conservation to different labels of people-friendly community-based conservation, their outcomes remain contested. This paper explores how, and in whose interests, approaches to wildlife conservation in Malawi have been reconfigured from fortress conservation to market–community collaborative management. Based on qualitative field data, we demonstrate how varying levels of community participation in the processes of wildlife conservation transformed the identities and interests of powerful groups of people regarding wildlife conservation in the Majete Wildlife Reserve. We highlight how commodification and monetarization of wildlife conservation served the interests of the emergent powerful groups whilst marginalizing those of the weak. The work indicates how new community identities with regard to wildlife conservation mask the power hegemonies that dictate mechanisms of inclusion and exclusion regarding natural resource use.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference36 articles.
1. If community conservation is the answer in Africa, what is the question?;Adams;Oryx,2001
2. The death of an elephant: conservation discourses versus practices in Africa;Benjaminsen;Forum for Development Studies,2010
3. Wildlife conservation in Malawi;Morris;Environment and History,2001
4. Commodity conservation: the restructuring of community conservation in South Africa and the Philippines;Büscher;Geoforum,2012
5. Brockington, D (2002) Fortress Conservation: The Preservation of Mkomazi Game Reserve in Tanzania. Bloomington, IN, USA: Indiana University Press.