Abstract
Among twenty-one representatives of as many nations comprising the World Commission on Environment and Development, there was unanimous agreement on all issues concerning the environment, except two—the causal significance of population growth, and what to do with Antarctica. The lack of consensus on population is symptomatic of widespread confusion not only in the theoretical and empirical literature, but also among advocates of population control.This paper argues that confusion stems from insufficient attention to the nature of the causes involved. Broadly speaking, there are two kinds—ultimate and proximate. Ultimate causes include polluting technologies, affluence-related wastes, environmental consequences of warfare, land and urban mismanagement policies, and so on. In contrast, proximate causes such as rapid population growth are shown to be more situation-specific, contemporary, and of a confounding nature.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Nature and Landscape Conservation,Pollution,Water Science and Technology
Reference47 articles.
1. Bandow D. (1989). What's still wrong with the World Bank? Orbis, Winter, pp. 73–89.
2. Blanchet D. (1988). Estimating the Relationship between Population Growth and Aggregate Economic Growth in LDCs: Methodological Problems. (Paper presented to the United Nations Expert Group on Consequences of Rapid Population Growth, 24–26 08.) United Nations, New York, NY, USA: 30 pp. (mimeogr.).
3. Population, Environment, and Conflict
Cited by
39 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献