Author:
Gibbons Patrick,Walshe David
Abstract
AbstractLegislation governing committal practice has been a cause of controversy worldwide. A review of the relevant literature highlights the ongoing debate between those advocating broadly based ‘need for treatment’ criteria as a basis for committal (‘Parens Patriae’), and those who advocate more narrowly defined criteria requiring evidence of ‘dangerousness’ to validate committal. Current committal law in Ireland follows the ‘Parens Patriae’ tradition. However the recently published Green Paper on Mental Health points out that the current law is not compatible with international obligations, making reform inevitable. The Green Paper suggests various alterations in relation to committal criteria and procedures, with the retention of both ‘need for treatment’ as well as ‘dangerousness’ as valid committal criteria. These changes appear to be compatible with the ‘Stone criteria’ adopted as a model committal law by the American Psychiatric Association.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Psychiatry and Mental health,Applied Psychology
Reference28 articles.
1. Is dangerousness an issue for psychiatrists in emergency commitment?;Peszke;Am J Psychiatry,1975
2. New Civil Commitment Legislation: The Relevance of Commitment “Criteria”
3. Clinical Judgments in the Decision to Commit
4. Commital procedures in Ireland: a study of the role of dangerousness in determining commital practice;Gibbons;Ir Med J,1992
5. Comment;Stone;Am J Psychiatry,1975
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Mental Health Services in Ireland;International Journal of Law and Psychiatry;2000-05