Abstract
“[M]any observers agree that the Commission has been ‘leaking like a sieve’”.Leaks have become a major element of European Union politics. The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) leak in early May 2016 is neither the first of its kind nor will it be the last. Transparency by leaks – or “transleakancy” as the series of publications of confidential TTIP negotiation documents has already been coined – is one element of the political game that different interest groups, governmental and non–governmental, play on both sides of the Atlantic. And yet, leaked EU documents have been shared in wider policy-networks all along, independent of whether they have received media attention or not. The difference is that leaks similar to those that we see on TTIP have reached a new level of importance. Here, themere fact of their existence makes them newsworthy. The impact of these leaks on public debates is seen as amajor risk for negotiators.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference26 articles.
1. “The 1992 CAP Reform, the Uruguay Round and the Commission: Conceptualizing Linked Policy Games”;Coleman;JMCS: Journal of Common Market Studies,1999
2. Inter-institutional decision-making: The case of the Common Agricultural Policy
3. Towards unlimited transparency? Morals and facts concerning leaking to the press by public officials in the Netherlands
4. “Transleakancy”
5. “Political Legitimacy and the Invisibility of Politics: Exploring the European Union's Communication Deficit”;Meyer;JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies,1999
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献