Abstract
A visual display ban on tobacco products, imposed by national legislation of an EEA State, such as the one at issue in the case at hand, constitutes a measure having equivalent effect to a quantitative restriction on imports within the meaning of Article 11 EEA if, in fact, the ban affects the marketing of products imported from other EEA States to a greater degree than that of imported products which were, until recently, produced in Norway. It is for the national court to identify the aims which the legislation at issue is actually intended to pursue and to decide whether the public health objective of reducing tobacco use by the public in general can be achieved by measures less restrictive than a visual display ban on tobacco products (author's headnote).
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference9 articles.
1. Of Motorcycle Trailers and Personal Watercrafts: The Battle over Keck;Prete;Legal Issues of Economic Integration,2008
2. Goodbye Keck? A Comment on the Remarkable Judgment in Commission vs Italy;Pecho;Legal Issues of Economic Integration,2009
3. Chronique – Marché intérieur;Sibony;Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Européen,2010
4. The EFTA Court, the ECJ, and the Latter's Advocates General – a Tale of Judicial Dialogue
5. Can Selling Arrangements be Harmonised?;Davies;European Law Review,2005
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献