Abstract
Regulators can avert corporate behaviour that inflicts risks on society, but is nevertheless compliant with the law. Such regulatory interventions beyond the law evoke contentious questions about their objects, legitimacy, methods, and the norms employed. No framework yet exists to analyse these questions in conjunction. Therefore, this paper proposes a typology of the extralegal frontier. The typology is based on a range of discretionary attitudes of regulators towards their enforcement mandate. This range comprises four types of regulators, with an increasingly extensive attitude: Law Enforcer, Legislative Agent, Social Broker, and Public Architect. The typology integrates diffuse scholarly insights into a coherent framework, which offers regulators and their stakeholders a starting point for reflection on interventions beyond the law.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference51 articles.
1. Regulation and Compliance Motivations: Examining Different Approaches
2. “The Uses of Legal Discretion: Perspective from Law and Social Science”;Hawkins;The Uses of Discretion,1992
3. “Cosmetic Compliance and the Failure of Negotiated Governance”;Krawiec;Wash. ULQ,2003
4. The Character of Harms
5. “The Essence of Responsive Regulation”;Braithwaite;UBCL Rev,2011
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献