Abstract
The requirements of free trade and economic globalisation and the respective international legal framework, namely in the context of the WTO, have led to a decrease of the regulatory power of the nation states which cannot be replaced by comparable public international law making – neither in content nor with respect to legitimacy considerations.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference52 articles.
1. Codes of Conduct;Stelzl;Arbeit im Betrieb,2001
2. International Trade and Environmental Governance: Relating Rules (and Standards) in the EU and the WTO
3. Prospects for a “World (internal) Law”?: Legal Developments in a Changing International System;Delbrück;Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies,2002
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. International Standardization and the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade;2018-09-21
2. Re-tuning Tuna? Appellate Body Report in US – Tuna II;European Journal of Risk Regulation;2012-09
3. Index;International Standardization and the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade
4. Select Bibliography;International Standardization and the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade
5. General Conclusions;International Standardization and the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade