Abstract
The extreme diversity of opinion as to the identity of the Klebs-Loeffler bacillus and the bacillus of Hofmann, and the importance of the subject from the public health standpoint, make it desirable to bring forward any facts which may assist in arriving at a solution of the problem.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Immunology
Reference17 articles.
1. Supplement. Report on Bac. diphtheriae and microorganisms liable to be confounded therewith;Gordon;31st Annual Report of Local Government Board,1903
2. Ueber die vermeintlichen „schwachvirulenten Diphtheriebacillen” des Conjunctivalsackes und die Differenzirung derselben von dem echten Diphtheriebacillus mittels des Behring'schen Heilserums
3. Ehrlich (1900). Report of 13th International Congress of Medicine at Paris (Section of Bacteriology and Parasitology), p. 28.
4. Discussion on “The Nature of the so-called Pseudo-diphtheria (Hofmann) Bacillus and its significance (if any) in the bacteriological examination for Diphtheria;Cobbett;Journal of State Medicine,1903
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献