Abstract
SUMMARYThere is no official scheme for testing disinfectants and detergent/disinfectants for use in the retail food trade and few recommended procedures have been given for the cleaning of equipment with these agents. Therefore, field trials were carried out in a large self-service store. Comparisons were made of the various cleaning efficiencies, as determined by bacterial plate counts, of detergent and disinfectant solutions and machine cleaning oils applied with either clean cloths or disposable paper towels to items of equipment. The most satisfactory results were always obtained when anionic detergent (0·75 % w/v) and hypochlorite (200 p.p.m. available chlorine) solutions were applied in a ‘two-step’ procedure.Tests were made to compare the calcium alginate swab-rinse and the agar sausage (Agaroid) techniques for the enumeration of bacteria on stainless steel, plastic, formica and wooden surfaces before and after a cleaning process. Although recovery rates were always greater by the swab-rinse technique, the agar sausage technique was considered to be a useful routine control method for surface sampling.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Immunology
Reference26 articles.
1. Microbiological Sampling of Surfaces
2. Symposium on methods for determining bacterial contamination on surfaces;Walter;Bacteriological Reviews,1955
3. A comparison of the recovery rates of organisms from cotton-wool and calcium alginate swabs;Higgins;Monthly Bulletin of the Ministry of Health and Public Health Laboratory Service,1950
4. Eine einfache und schnelle bakteriologische Betriebskontrolle in Fleisch verarbeitenden Betrieben mittels Agar-Würsten in Rilsan-Kunstdarm;Ten;Fleischwirtschaft,1963
Cited by
31 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献