Abstract
Abstract
Background
Few studies provide clear rationale for and the reception of adaptations of evidence-based interventions. To address this gap, we describe the context-dependent adaptations in critical time intervention-task shifting (CTI-TS), a manualized recovery program for individuals with psychosis in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil and Santiago, Chile. Implications of the adaptations – incorporating a task-shifting approach and modifying the mode of community-based service delivery – are examined from users' perspectives.
Methods
A secondary analysis of in-depth interviews with CTI-TS users (n = 9 in Brazil; n = 15 in Chile) was conducted. Using the framework method, we thematically compared how participants from each site perceived the main adapted components of CTI-TS.
Results
Users of both sites appreciated the task-shifting worker pair to provide personalized, flexible, and relatable support. They wanted CTI-TS to be longer and experienced difficulty maintaining intervention benefits in the long-term. In Chile, stigma and a perceived professional hierarchy toward the task-shifting providers were more profound than in Brazil. Engagement with community-based services delivery in homes and neighborhoods (Chile), and at community mental health centers (Brazil) were influenced by various personal, familial, financial, and social factors. Uniquely, community violence was a significant barrier to engagement in Brazil.
Conclusion
CTI-TS’ major adaptations were informed by the distinct mental health systems and social context of Santiago and Rio. Evaluation of user experiences with these adaptations provides insights into implementing and scaling-up task-shifting and community-oriented interventions in the region through the creation of specialized roles for the worker pair, targeting sustained intervention effects, and addressing socio-cultural barriers.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference40 articles.
1. The mental health system in Brazil: Policies and future challenges
2. Defining Peer Roles and Status Among Community Health Workers and Peer Support Specialists in Integrated Systems of Care
3. Robila, M (2016) Families, mental health and wellbeing: Pursuing sustainable development goal 3. United Nations Expert Group Meeting. 12-13 May. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA): Division for Social Policy and Development. Available at https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/family/docs/egm16/MihaelaRobila.pdf (Accessed 13 March 2020).
4. World Health Organization (WHO) (2014 a) Mental health atlas country profile 2014: Brazil. Available at https://www.who.int/mental_health/evidence/atlas/profiles-2014/bra.pdf?ua=1 (Accessed 24 February 2020).
5. World Health Organization (WHO) and Ministerio de Salud de Chile (2007) Informe WHO-AIMS sobre Sistema de Salud Mental en Chile [Report: WHO-AIMS about the mental health system in Chile]. Santiago, Chile.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献