Abstract
The apparent rapidity of the loss of case-marking distinctions in English has been used as evidence that Middle English was a Creole. However, an examination of the available facts indicates that the reduction of case marking was more gradual and orderly than has often been assumed. The impression of ‘confused’ usage in many texts disappears once a proper distinction between form and category is made. The reduction of case marking seems to have begun with syncretism of forms but retention of categories, with one form spreading into the territory of another. The facts do not support the idea that case marking was drastically reduced as part of the formation of a Creole. However, it is likely that language contact played a significant role in the quick acceptance of internally motivated changes.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference49 articles.
1. Accusative–dative syncretism in the Lindisfarne Gospels;Blakeley;English and Germanic Studies,1947
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Sociolinguistic Typology Meets Historical Corpus Linguistics;Transactions of the Philological Society;2023-11
2. An Overview of Contact-Induced Morphosyntactic Changes in Early English;New Approaches to English Historical Linguistics;2023
3. The Loss of Case;The Linguistics of the History of English;2023
4. A typological perspective on the loss of inflection*;Studies in Language Companion Series;2021-06-15
5. A typological perspective on the loss of inflection Abdul1;Studies in Language Companion Series;2021-06-15