Abstract
Political historians have long depended on aggregate records of political behavior—“election returns”—as a crucial resource in the historical study of American politics. During the past 30 years, however, the “new” political historians have increasingly turned to the U.S. census to reveal relationships between political and social behavior in the American past. The veritable revolution in American political history in recent decades, in fact, has largely depended on the political analysis of census records. Political historians now routinely mine the U.S. census for social, demographic, and economic information about voters and officeholders, states and regions, specific decades, and even “political eras.” Census data are most crucial to the political history of the nineteenth century and have benefited, in particular, the debate over levels of voter turnout, the study of political leadership through collective biography, and the ethnocultural model of political behavior.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Social Sciences (miscellaneous),History
Reference33 articles.
1. Constitutional implications of a population undercount: Making sense of the census clause.;McKay;Georgetown Law Journal,1981
2. Nominal Record Linkage and the Study of Non-Secret Voting: A Danish Case
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. New Estimates of Census Coverage in the United States, 1850–1930;Social Science History;2013
2. Stalking the Elusive Homicide;Social Science History;2001
3. Bias in Wealth and Income Records;Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History;1996-01-01