Abstract
Abstract
Introduction:
The goal of a research ethics consultation service (RECS) is to assist relevant parties in navigating the ethical issues they encounter in conduct of research. The goal of this survey was to describe the current landscape of research ethics consultation and document if and how it has changed over the last decade.
Methods:
The survey instrument was based on the survey previously circulated. We included a number of survey domains from the previous survey with the goal of direct comparison of outcomes. The survey was sent to 57 RECS in the USA and Canada.
Results:
Forty-nine surveys were completed for an overall response rate of 86%. With the passing of 10 years, the volume of consults received by RECS surveyed has increased. The number of consults received by a subset of RECS remains low. RECS continues to receive requests for consults from a wide range of stakeholders. About a quarter of RECS surveyed actively evaluate their services, primarily through satisfaction surveys routinely shared with requestors. The number of RECS evaluating their services has increased. We identified a group of eight key competencies respondents find as key to providing RECS.
Conclusions:
The findings from our survey demonstrate that there have been growth and development of RECS since 2010. Further developing evaluation and competency guidelines will help existing RECS continue to grow and facilitate newly established RECS maturation. Both will allow RECS personnel to better serve their institutions and add value to the research conducted.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference21 articles.
1. Building a Central Repository for Research Ethics Consultation Data: A Proposal for a Standard Data Collection Tool
2. Hotline Bling: Late-Night Ethics Calls as an Alternative to Research Ethics Consultations
3. Expanding the Scope of Research Ethics Consultation Services in Safeguarding Research Integrity: Moving Beyond the Ethics of Human Subjects Research
4. Beyond Open Communication: A Call for Partnership Between Clinical Ethics and Research Ethics Committees
5. 16. Frederico, C , Young, J , Taylor, HA , Porter, K. Evaluating research ethics consultation services: exploring practices and defining common measures, 2021, American Society of Bioethics & Humanities Annual Meeting, (website?)
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献